We all know the story of the Upper and Lower Canadian Rebellions: we know about the patriotes of Lower Canada and the reformers of Upper Canada; we know about the victories and defeats, expulsions and executions; we know about the social, political, and economic implications in Canada, and their consequences on our history. In general, in Canada, we view the Rebellions as an important Canadian event. However, the Rebellions were also an American event, with major consequences in the United States.
In this post, I will briefly explain the research that I am currently conducting as a postdoctoral fellow at the McNeil Center for Early American Studies at the University of Pennsylvania and how my time in Philadelphia has changed the overall aim of my project.
Whether they wanted it or not, Americans were dragged into this conflict. In the wake of the failed 1837 Canadian Rebellions, several rebel leaders sought refuge in American border towns like Burlington and Watertown, where they sought assistance from Americans. They met with local leaders and politicians and travelled to major cities such as Boston and Philadelphia seeking financial and military support. Though they failed to secure the assistance of the Federal government—which even sent troops to the border to ensure “American neutrality”—they had more success at the local level. Throughout Michigan, Vermont, and New York, Americans living in the borderland expressed sympathy for the Canadian rebels and joined secret societies, known as Hunter’s Lodges. By the thousands, they pledged to free Canada from the yoke of British imperialism and assist the rebels in a “Canadian Revolution.”
The Rebellions were especially important since they coincided with a momentous period in American history. The United States was in the midst of the Jacksonian democracy; the Panic of 1837 and the broader economic transformations that some historians have called the “Market Revolution” were causing acute economic anxiety; Texas had seceded from Mexico; American territorial expansion was well underway; and debates regarding slavery raged on. In this critical context, Canada’s Rebellions played a major role. They became a source of conflict and debate. Like the Texas Revolution and the creation of the Republic of Texas, there were important social, political, and economic stakes with the “Canadian Revolution” and the prospects of two independent Canadian Republics.
Though the rebellions have been the subject of numerous studies in Canada, the American perspective remains underappreciated. Most Canadian scholars have considered the event from a local and Canadian perspective. The Rebellions’ causes and consequences remain generally rooted in Canadian context and historiography, focusing on the longstanding Canadian struggle for nascent nationalism. The studies of the event from an American perspective limit themselves to the Hunters’ Lodges and their general involvement in the conflict. They do not explain what social, political, or economic factors pushed Americans to oppose or support the Rebellions. And though there have been numerous studies on the momentous changes that defined this period, they overlook the impact of Canada’s Rebellions on the transformative events that were taking place to the south.
My project investigates the place of the Rebellions in the United States. Based on the works of transnational historians, like Daniel Rodgers, David Thelen, Michel Ducharme, and Alan Taylor, historians that have shown the importance of studying regional events from a transnational perspective, my overall project takes the Rebellions out of their Canadian context and places them in a North American one. It investigates how the American social, political, and economic context (as described above) shaped their responses to it, and argues that this Canadian conflict had a significant impact in the United States.
When I first imagined this project, I initially planned to use the “borderlands” framework. This framework made sense: borderlanders were geographically closest to Canada, and had more to gain and lose from the Rebellions. Frequent exchanges with Canadians, along with contacts with rebel refugees, would have made borderlanders more familiar with the issues at play. However, after more than a year in Philadelphia, my plans have changed. As I began searching through newspapers and archival material, I saw that my initial hypothesis—that borderlanders were more interested in the event—was not the case. Borderlanders were not the only ones that had much to gain or lose with the Rebellions. Americans from the south, from the slave states, also had much to gain (or in this case lose) with the Rebellions. Southern newspaper editors, for example, worried that if the rebels succeeded and the Canadas became independent republics, they would be annexed to the United States as free states (as opposed to slave states); a prospect that would have serious ramifications on debates regarding slavery. They feared that the balance of power would tip towards the free states. More importantly, southern slaveholders exercised such a heavy influence over foreign policy in Washington—as recently demonstrated by historian Matthew Karp—that the editor of the Public Ledger advised the rebels (in an open letter) that if they wanted the support of the Federal government, they had to declare both Canadas as “slave states.”
Did slaveholders use their influence in Washington to prevent any attempt to free Canada from the yoke of British imperialism in order to prevent its independence and subsequent integration in the United States? Did slaveholding interests shape American official neutrality? This is where my time in Philadelphia and at the McNeil Center has pushed my research. It has refocused my more general examination of the United States and the Rebellions around the issue of slavery. It has pushed me to consider the Rebellions and Canada’s place in the slave debates that were dividing the United States and how slavery in the United States—a subject that is of little concern to most Canadian historians—influenced the course of one of the most important events in Canadian history. More importantly, it has led me to consider how the Rebellions in Canada—a subject that is of little concern to historians of slavery in the United States—shaped the slave debates in the United States. As such, I hope to follow in the footsteps of historians like Caleb McDaniel and look at the slave debates in America as a transnational phenomenon that involved Canada and the Rebellions.
Maxime Dagenais (PhD, 2011, University of Ottawa) is a SSHRC postdoctoral fellow at the McNeil Center for Early American Studies at the University of Pennsylvania, and studies the American reaction to the Canadian Rebellions in the context of the slave debates. He is currently coediting a collection on the subject scheduled for publication in 2017 with Early American Studies, published by the University of Pennsylvania Press.
 One of the only published studies to make an explicit link between Jacksonian ideology and the Rebellions is Andrew Bonthius’ “The Patriot War of 1837-1838: Locofocoism With a Gun?” His article suggests that concerns over capitalism and the disappearance of traditional socio-economic values were present amongst some supporters of the Rebellions in Ohio. Andrew Bonthius, “The Patriot War of 1837-1838: Locofocoism With a Gun?” Labour 52 (Fall 2003): 9-43.
Image: “The American Steam Packet Caroline Descending the Great Falls of Niagara after being set on fire by the British, Dec. 29, 1837.” After W. R. Callington, 1838, National Maritime Museum, Greenwich. Creative Commons License.